Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 18:02:44 GMT
Cairo Trades
Creation Draft Round 2 (69) Creation Draft Round 3 (76) Creation Draft Round 4 (141) Creation Draft Round 5 (148) Creation Draft Round 6 (213) Cairo First Round 2001 Cairo First Round 2003
Brose Trades
Creation Draft Round 1 (8)- Patrick Ewing Creation Draft Round 10 (353) Creation Draft Round 12 (429) Creation Draft Round 14 (497) Creation Draft Round 15 (512)
|
|
|
Post by Vancouver on Sept 2, 2015 18:04:21 GMT
cairo. by. a. lot.
|
|
|
Post by New Orleans on Sept 2, 2015 18:06:29 GMT
Even...
One or two FRINGE top 75 players and arguably no real value in those Cairo firsts for a star is amazing if you look at it from Cairo's view.
The ability to have 8 top 150 guys and 10 in the top 200 is impressive and 5 total 1sts going forward makes it sweeter from Brose's view.
To each their own.
|
|
|
Post by Chicago on Sept 2, 2015 18:31:28 GMT
Stockton and Ewing are together again. Reminds me of the good ole days in San Miguel.
I think if Brose had kept the team as is led by Ewing he could certainly get another couple players that would compliment him well in this draft alone. That gives him just as good a chance at the championship as anyone else the first couple years especially considering Ewing is only 25 giving him multiple years to put talent around him.
On the other hand, Cairo will be Stockton and Ewing with a bunch of green players so who knows. I would still rather be in Cairo's position with 2 mega stars and deal with the surrounding talent later.
|
|
|
Post by Newcastle on Sept 2, 2015 18:36:02 GMT
Pretty crazy trade, obviously on paper looks like Cairo got the best of the deal by pairing Ewing with Stockton but it's going to be tough to fill out the team especially in the short term. I know Bamberg loses Ewing and I dunno if I would of moved him in a deal like this, but can't knock having all those picks and the depth it will bring. I'd probably give the edge to Cairo just about because of Ewing but does it really make sense for either?
|
|